Published on September 1st, 2008 | by Guest Contributor0
GTR: Greendiana Jones – Simple Living Lessons from the Maya with Dr. Eric Gibson
GreenTalk Radio Host Sean Daily discusses simple living, anthropology, and lessons from the Maya culture with Dr. Eric Gibson, author of Nine Lords of the Night.
[Voice Over]: This program is brought to you by personalifemedia.com.
[intro]: Hi. Welcome to Green Talk, a pod casters from
greenlivingideas.com. Green Talk helps listeners and their efforts to
live more eco-friendly lifestyles through interviews with top vendors
authors and experts from around the world. We discuss the critical
issues facing the global environment today as well as the technologies,
products and practices that you can employ to go greener in very area
of your life.
Sean Daily: Hey, everybody welcome to Green Talk Radio. This is
Sean Daily. I’m excited about today’s episode. My guest is Dr. Eric
Gibson. He’s an author-archeologist, an anthropologist who holds a PhD
in Anthropology from Harvard University. He has special and extensive
experience with the Maya culture. And, live for ten years among
various aboriginal groups including the Maya. Eric also directed
archeological research projects in Central America, French Polynesia
and North America. And, last but not the least; he is the author of an
archeological mystery novel entitled ‘Nine Lords of the Night’ which is
set against the background of Zapatista uprising in Chiapas, Mexico in
So, first of all, Eric welcome to the program.
Dr. Eric Gibson: Thanks for having me.
Sean: It is our pleasure. We’re going to be talking today about:
Learning about Eco-Living and Green Living from ancient civilization
since, specifically, I think we’re going to end up talking a quite a
bit of the Maya culture. So, why don’t we just start right there,
Eric. Tell us about, I knew that you have a lot of special knowledge
about that culture but also several others. May be you just tell us
.some, first, basic information about the Maya culture. Sort of what
it makes it special and significant in history and, .the most curious,
a little bit of stories about how you came to study it.
Eric: Oh, boy, that’s going to take a couple of minutes.
Sean: That’s an out fall.
Eric: [giggles] Well, the Maya were one of the high civilizations
of the new world, probably the entire world for that matter. There
seen as the peak of the classic Maya period in 900 AD. They covered
all of what is now Guatemala, Chiapas, Belize, good portion of Honduras
and other portions of southern and western Mexico. And, what a little
known fact, I think, by most people, is that they were able to sustain
a population that, it’s harder to believe, it is meant to be three
times larger than what the number of people live there now. And the
way they did that was through extensive agricultural projects like:
rice fields’ agriculture, terracing, irrigation; they had game parks;
they were very much in tune with their environment.
Sean: Interesting. Now you mentioned in some of your writings that
they flourished for many years in harsh environments, and in your book
you discussed their culture and ecology. Can you share some of that
information specifically with our listeners?
Eric: Yes. Not until 20 years ago when we started using a side
scanning radar to penetrate the tropical rain forest that archeologist
from university of Texas, Richard Adams and a few other guys looked at
the satellite imagery and they notice networks of canals, grids, roads
and, just structures and infrastructures that we have no idea existed
until that technology was brought there on the tropical low ends.
The Maya were able to mobilize and organize their people to, basically
take land like swamps, like the mangrove swamps that you see there
now. Raise up these fields with mud, recycled food and, basically they
knew how to decompose in a very large and grand scale. That’s how they
supported such a large population.
That always leads to the question of ‘What happened?’, ‘Why did that system break down?’
Of course, we don’t know all the answers but it does in deed looks like
warfare. And, a period of droughts. Once the population got such a
large extent. When you had droughts in one region it affected the
people that believe and, of course, feed themselves. So, they would go
up against the cultures they were so closely connected to by kinship
and lineages. That would be a bad thing because of the people were
actually supposed to be growing crops are now fighting people.
Eric: It’s the domino effect.
Eric: That’s why it took probably two or three centuries for the
classic period to turn to the post classic period, the period of great
brutality and warfare.
Sean: So, that’s pretty conclusive and that you consider really
that it was the warfare and, sort of the appropriation of those
resources – the agricultural resources to warfare. Is that pretty much
considered among scholars the accepted reason for the down fall of the
Eric: You know, scholars never accept everything.
Sean: [tickled] And certainly not unilaterally.
Eric: [funny] No. But I would say that for the last 20 years that’s
kind cool I’ve seen around the idea that progressed over time they
indeed compete for resources and then they took the guys who were made
good farmers and they turn them into soldiers. And who’s doing the
farming? Right? I mean, the thing about the rice field agriculture
that I was talking about that you could see over Belize and into the
region of Guatemala that requires a fair amount of maintenance. And if
take these people out of the maintenance loop pretty soon the jungle
reclaims it and then it’s a big disaster waiting situation that keeps
getting worse and population continuous to do different things to get
it’s food and you see the movement towards the coast lines. So, they
started to be more maritime focused in the late classic period. You
see areas being abandoned were there’s a lot of warfare.
Sean: [agreeing] Now, this is interesting. Archeology and
anthropology have served become sexy in the media. It’s kind funny, I
mean in Indiana Jones, I think Carlos Castanedas did this in the 70s
for anthropology and then we’ve seen certainly with the Indiana Jones
films that they came out originally back, I guess that was the late 70s
through out the 80s. And, then, have now of course research with the
latest installment. It’s kind of become sexy and I think it also a lot
of people now are interesting to see how we’re studying ancient
civilizations. There have been books such as ‘Are We Rome’. They’re
looking at sort of the appetizer for past civilization to say such as
roman civilization. And, now they treat us on the Maya’ civilization.
What went wrong in terms of the society, culturally or even
ecologically as may be the case of these cultures to see in what we can
learn from them before it’s too late on our end. So, I want to talk to
you more about that. So we’ll boggy right back. We’re going to take a
quick break and I’ll be back with Dr. Eric Gibson. We’ll be back in
Green Talk Radio in just a few brief moments. Thanks everybody.
Sean: Okay, and we’re back on Green Talk Radio. We’re talking on:
Learning about Eco -living and Green Living from Maya and Other
Civilizations. My guest is Dr. Eric Gibson. He’s
author-archeologist/anthropologist with the PhD from Harvard
University. He’s also the author of ‘Nine Lords of the Knight’ which
you can find online at www.nineorgs.com.
Eric, we’re talking
before the break just about some of the basics of Mayan history… Is
it Maya history or Mayan history? Do put an ‘n’ on that? I was
wondering about that.
Eric: Oh, you know, you can say the easy way. The way I heard it in Harvard, so that’s must be right.
Sean: Okay. ..I think fine reading references online so it’s
getting confused on that. The wiki entry also uses Maya or is it?
Eric: Either way is acceptable but most archeologists would say ‘Maya’ because it can be use as singular or plural.
Sean: Okay. So, we’re talking about some of the Maya history and
the culture and the break down of that culture and some of the things
scholars’ spells happened there. I just to find out a little bit
about… I want to ask you question related to anthropology and
archeology. But, actually, before we can go any further there I like to
break those terms down, if you would not mind helping for listening
audience. Give us some quick break down the differences between
anthropology and archeology.
Eric: Sure. Anthropology is the study of human behavior and humans
in all places and all times. It’s very broad field. Archeology is
study of the past, the material, the culture of this human we are
trying to reconstruct the ways of life were. And archeology itself can
be broken down to several different sub fields. Like nautical
archeology – those are the guys do the shipwrecks, historical
archeology deal with the historical period with European contact. In
the new world, it’s a very fascinating period. And, there are the
prehistorians like I am the period before the European contact. There
is also Classical… archeology which is Greek and roman. And biblical
archeology which is the archeology of the bible with the Israelis. Many
different universities in the United States got lots of good
departments to do that.
Sean: Okay. Thanks. I appreciate you doing that. So, being as you
are about anthropologist and archeologist having all these experience
that you have in cultures like the Maya culture. I was just curious,
this is one of the reasons that we want to talk to you today is that
may be you could share some of the things that you’ve learned about,
eco-living and environmentally friendly living, and simple living from
Eric: Sure. I would say that from the happiest people on that
lived among are people having least amount of material things and
stuff. You know, if I was to be drop somewhere in the tropical rain
forest with only one or two tools. The first tool would be a machete.
And the other tool would be a hammer. And with those two things you
can basically make it down there. And I’ve seen guys do that. [giggles]
Sean: Really, just a machete and a hammer?
Eric: Oh yeah. It’s amazing what a Maya Indian, one in the modern
Maya, worked within Belize, form example, can do with a machete., I
mean, they open up beer bottles, they turn the coconut pretty
quickly. They can fashion tools. They’re amazing. They even build a
hut from the ground up. Talk about what’s the necessary tool? What one
thing you are going to need? It’s going to be a machete down there.
And, like I said they seem to reflect on everything. You just don’t
feel a whole lot of big trash piles around their villages. That’s
something I came to admire by just living among them. It’s little they
really wanted. They just want to have food and shelter and able to
observe their religious practices and everyday if nothing bad happened
it’s a good day. I mean, they’re just happy people. Very well adapted
to their environment.
Sean: So you tribute that to the lack of stuff and what in distractions that they’re living a simple life… [interrupted]
Eric: At least they’re not yet getting constantly bombarded with
commercials to tell them that they will demise if they don’t have a BMW
Sean: [agreeing] Right. The culture consumerism.
Eric:Yeah. I mean just like the little saying ‘ they have what they
want and want what they have.’ I just hope they’re in balance. That
doesn’t mean they would turn down a nice 4×4.
Sean: [humored] Right. But there’s the difference that and hinging your happiness on having it.
Eric: Yes. And they do not. Hinge their happiness on things. Their
happiness seems on family and friends and social networks.
Sean: And I knew that Buddha says, ‘ desires are root of suffering’ I guess it’s sort of co-related to that.
Eric: Yes, It is. There’s actually proof of it. And they’re not
the only ones like that too. You see that also among Indian
reservations in New Mexico. And, of course, there’s the casino in
different time and things. But I think that’s just the revenge of the
white men [giggles]
Sean: Yeah. That adds in new cases of there only the opportunity to maintain civilization and financial process.
Eric: Really, there’s nothing much else you could with it. Right?
Sean: It’s a very unfortunate end result to that long standing problem.
Somebody make the argument that the reason sort of eco-harmony going
back to the lack of waste that you mentioned not seeing on the streets
and things like that might be to the fact that they have such a lack
and they are so impoverished. I mean, could be on that? Do you get a
certain inherent cultural harmonization with the environment? That’s
really rooted in the foundations of the culture?
Eric: Some say that’s exactly what it is. And it has been the way it is for millennia. They don’t feel impoverished.
Sean: Why have we lost that?
Eric: You know, it’s something that we’ve evolved here in the
west… it’s the technological advances, it’s the radical changes. I
was thinking about that the other night. And I saw there would be
blood with Daniel Day Lewis. It’s a perfect example of 180 degrees of
the Maya way of life.
Sean: Right. We’re going to take one more break here and we’ll be
back. We’re talking on: Learning about Eco-living and Green Living from
Maya and Other Cultures. My guest is Dr. Eric Gibson. His book is
‘Nine Lords of the Night’. You can find that online. Am I correct?
It’s also available in e-book as well, Eric?
Eric: Yes. It’s available in the kindle format in amazon.com as well.
Sean: And it’s ninelords.com. And we’ll be right back in Green Talk Radio.
Sean: Hey everyone, we’re back on Green Talk Radio. This is Sean
Daily. Today we’re talking about: Learning about Eco-living from Maya
Civilization and Other Cultures, and Anthropology and Archeology as
Relates to Green Living’. My guest, talking to me about that, is Dr.
Eric Gibson. He’s an author- archeologist.
I’m having a hard time on… I want to mix them together, ‘anthrocheopologist’. Something like that.
Anyway, he’s an archeologist and anthropologist and holds a PhD from
Harvard. He has a book out which is called ‘Nine Lords of the Night’
and it’s actually a fictional work but I think it is kind for
anthropology what the Da Vinci Code did for art curators and code
junkies as for code crackers. We’re talking before the break about lot
of things. Actually, we were talking about certain examples and Mayan
civilization with that it really related in eco-living and simple
living and sort of the roots of unhappiness and modern consumerism and
things like that. I want to switch gears a little bit in the segment
and talk about. I think one gets the impression in pop culture and for
the media sometimes that ancient civilizations and people really need
of cultures throughout history or at least majority of them have lived
in complete harmony with nature and their immediate environment. I
often questioned whether that was really the case. Do you have
examples of any prehistoric cultures that were, perhaps, out of balance
with their environment as we’ve become in so many ways?
Eric: Yes. There’re a lot of them. Easter Island, Polynesians.
They went a little bit nuts. Tied up the heads, over reaching the
One of the first ones that I encountered were
basically the prehistoric culture made a mistake and clearly the
mistake they made with the environment is if you go out to the Olympic
peninsula in the Washington State, keep flattery, there’s an
archeological site there called Ozette. Which is one of the best
preserve archeological sites in the north America and they are
sometimes called north America’s Pompeii because things were covered up
all at once in less than place in perfectly preserved under tons of
And the reason that happened to this village is that they had a ridge
line behind their village, they’re right on the beach. The ridge line,
they cut every tree down to build the village, plake houses and so
forth. These are very sophisticated northwest coast culture Indians
who made a living lately with long boots, harpoons and so forth. So,
they hade a period of extensive rain and its like capsize them. The
evidence, they buried it out. And a giant mud slide occurred because
they’ve taken all the trees down. That’s a pretty good example of being
out of balance would you say?
Sean: Definitely. That’s an ancient clear cutting and the results of it.
Eric: Yeah, but because of that everything was left in place. It’s
a very rich archeological site. I would gather that the Makah Indians
thought it was rather unfortunate incident.
Sean: Do you have other examples of complete cultural wipe-out from
living out of harmony? Or was, is it that cultures are pushed that
far? At least most people believe in this culture we are on the verge
of possibly doing.
Eric: Yeah. As I was saying, the Easter Island, the Polynesians,
they just about over tasking the environment to the point was they kill
each other for gigs.
Sean: Was that complete elimination of their society as a result of that?
Eric: Not completely but certainly impacted it to the extent they
cut the population down by 90% in one generation. That’s pretty close.
Sean: That’s pretty significant. Yes that’s pretty close as that.
Eric: But, you know, what’s interesting is? The Hawaiians, on the
other hand, where I worked in Kawaii and Maui… Can you believe that my
first job, an ecology graduate from University of Oregon, undergrad,
once I got to work in Hawaii.
Sean: You can work in worst places.
Eric: [humored] Yeah.
Sean: I remember I was on Tahiti and he was on Maria and I saw that
the University some place in the United States had a scientific output
for college kids on Maria. I thought that was a great one to land.
Sean: Those kids are sakes.
Eric: Yep. I really did feel that one out until I hit the jackpot.
I first work out there for about nine or ten months. I guess it’s
called Cultural Resource Management. It’s the official term we used to
call salvage archeology. That would be like one it’s going to be a
big tourist. Like one time we went to a place called Mau Worst in
Maui. That was to move prehistoric Hawaiian cemetery out of the way so
they can put up this great big resort complex which is there now.
Although…it’s about being involve and moving all these burials. But
came back to work I was in charge of the management of their ecological
resources. The Hawaiians realize early on that they need to have a way
to get every lineage every clan. They’re very highly involved chief.
They’re probably like rank civilizations. The Polynesians, Hawaii
probably just on a calf of becoming as complicated as the Maya and in
turn about just becoming a state. Large state with lots of cities and
so forth. but I think they were held back by the fact they were on
these islands and they recognized that they needed to have a piece of
the ecology every clan has equal access and so they created these
districts that you can picture Maui guide. They would start from the
beach and they will fill up in the foot hills and they go all the way
up in the ridge line and so you have equal access to water, you have
equal access the best area to grow bread fruit and, the hunting like
the game preserves and they sliced the islands up in pie shape. The
boundaries. And there were even boundaries marked by stone walls.
That was pretty sophisticated and that worked pretty well for them
until you do your kin showed up. They were even close to being exact
opposite to what happened in Easter Island.
Sean: Okay. I knew you discussed somebody’s writings how the
destructions of Mayan environments today is damaging the field of
ethnobotany. I’m just curious if you like to elaborate a little bit
about that here.
Eric: First of all, I should play the boy from one of my colleagues
when I was in school. Wade Davis does a series on Smithsonian channel
called the ‘Goliath Eating the World’. Wade and I are there at the
same time in grad school. Ethnobotany is some field of anthropology is
a study of medicinal applications of native plants. Back, I was
explaining what a Shaman, but the common name for a Shaman is a witch
doctor. But this is the healer in any given tribe or culture. These
men and women, the Shaman, they have element of knowledge what the
plants are and what the properties are and how they can be used to heal
people. And they use magic and medicine together into fluvial complex
rituals. But one of the things I talked about is as rain forest has
approximately to a million or so species complex plants that covered
the earth. After 200 years of study Ethnobotanist can name you about
one to 250,000 of them. So when you start logging and displacing the
native cultures and logging and destroying the forest you’re losing
more than just forest. You’re losing knowledge and you could be losing
them potential of a drug. A pharmaceutical product that could be
develops from their knowledge but they’re not there anymore and neither
is the forest.
Sean: And has always typical has been the role of the Shamans and
each of these cultures to understand… to be essentially Ethnobotanist
within the tribe. But from healing perspective of a more pragmatic
physical healing as well as on the spiritual side?
Eric: Exactly. That’s exactly what they do. They do that and
more. I mean, they have ‘magical’ powers and they can stoke some
cultures that they can shape shift. Have this animals familiar that
they can send to spy on your enemies or put a curse on you. It goes
beyond medicine. But it’s all tied up in the same ideological bundle.
Medicine and magic they are all part of this thing.
Sean: and that extends the stake with the perceptions of some
western cultures that they did magic. And some, you know, quite
frankly, they do things that are close to that and feel like that so…
Eric: There’s anthropological literature on the power of belief.
It’s tied in the study of Shamans and theses cultures. And if you
think about, even a modern western trained doctors will tell you that
a patient has the will and really believes that they’re going to defeat
the subversions… that’s the 5o% of ..
Sean: Psychosomatic essentially.
Eric: Exactly. So, we can dismiss them as medicine men but its works, right?
Sean: If it’s worth it. It’s good. I think the bottom line…
Eric: Exactly, somebody says, if you heal me I believe what you
do. And that’s how they manage to sustain themselves, with the respect
and the credibility for that with in the local villages.
Sean: Eric, as an archeologist. I’m curious, how you feel that
your field is depicted, for example, in Indiana Jones movies?
Eric: Well, you know, I was an archeologist before I show Indiana
Jones. I can’t claim to be in the generation that was influenced by the
movies but I do believe that was a good thing. Because, I think,
archeologist today who earn their 30s and their 20s, many of them, were
attracted by the romanticized version of archeology that’s presented in
those movies and I like them and entertainment just much as anybody
else does but in may opinion Indiana Jones is one of the worst
archeologist I ever seen.
Sean: Is that right? Why?
Eric: Because every site he works at gets to shred.
Sean: I supposed that is violating the prime directive of archeology.
Eric: Well, that’s not the general idea, right? To blow things up
and have big things going down. Things collapsing. You’re supposed to
stop the whole tomb collapsing on you. It’s really not recommendable.
Sean: Point taken.
Eric: But at the same time I guess I like the movie although I
thought the last one was pretty far out there because the crystals
skulls all proven to be fakes. Not one of them is credible
archeological artifact in any excavation with any non contacts. It’s
very interesting that crystals skulls never been found any bone-fired
archeologist that it seems creeping in to some by collections
somewhere. And, you’ve seen the movie?
Sean: Yes. I was not even aware that the crystal skulling was a
reference to anything based on purported fact. So that’s interesting
to me. I thought that was a…[interrupted].
Eric: Oh, it’s been around. They were well known facts since the
mid 19th century. But I just thought, hear and poured out. And put
them in David and company and send them in exact spot because. I
didn’t see how the whole lot to do with archeology.
Sean: Now, we’re always talking about that. I’m going to put on at
the risk of putting on my tin foil hat and asking a tin-foil-hat
question there. I don’t have one of them. It’s more on the other side
of the fence. But empirical computer scientist by nature but I am
curious because there’re the references in the film and I think there
had been long standing beliefs by many people that some of the
technology that various civilization have had, example the Egyptians,
wit the building of the pyramids and the Mayans. Even in the ancient
Toltecs and goes on and on. They exceeded what would seem to be even
by the estimation of many anthropologists their capacity to learn and
understand or in some cases perform constructions feats some things
Is there any reliable evidence, whatsoever, that any
culture in history, I mean anything, anyone anytime. Was ever visited
Let me put it this way, that scientist; anthropologist can not explain how that culture came upon that information?
Sean: So, that’s all explainable.
Eric: It’s the center of the saying, ‘all theses poor barbaric
cultures only alien intelligence could have able them to build the
great pyramid of Egypt, The great pyramids down there in Chiapas and
write about my book. If you say archeology and get in to it to the
level you have to. Hold graduate degrees in it you can see there’s
plenty of evidence, over time, for them to develop each one of the
technologies, shall we say others, that chariots of the gods like one
that, I think one of the guys started the whole thing off back in the
They just seem not wanting to give the indigenous cultures
credit to figure things out. And large enough work force and organized
engineering crew these pyramids can be built. And they were built
quite often and quite well. It’s interesting to me that I’m…
How can I put this? I mean the truth is out there, right? I mean it’s
quite possible that there are life forms somewhere else in the universe
besides earth. It seems kind of human self-centeredness to think we’re
the only ones. But when it comes to archeology, there’s no shed of
evidence that any alien cultures did anything.
Eric: Now that, I think, I could be more uncritical than that.
Sean: And, so, before we go, I’m just curious, Eric, did you have
any final thoughts you want to share with our listening audience?
Eric: Well, green and simple living, I mean I think I was first
introduce when I live in Oregon when I was an undergraduate of
University of Oregon. Eugene, Oregon, is one of the most green cities
I think in the United States.
But, by nature, when we,
archeologist, went into the filed we have to be respectful of the land
and the land owners and we have to try to leave the smallest foot print
as possible and to that end we don’t disturb archeological site too
much. We have a very organize way of taking care of waste. We have
water pumps to solar heating to big oil drums create the showers that
we luke-cold because they weren’t even luke-warm. If its one thing
that I would say whenever ask me if I’m on the field what I missed the
most about civilization? I would just been able to walk into a place
and get a hot shower. Really hot.
Sean: I find most people who travel in all over the country seems
to be the common thing to say. I know on my own experience that’s
exactly how I feel as well. It’s the greatest of all modern luxuries I
Eric: There’s just sometime exciting when you’re packing to the field and you figuring it out just what you need. Right?
Like two duffle bags. And all your goods are in those two duffle bags.
When you got to the airport and get ready to fly to different country
and go set up a camp in remote area and you get into the land where get
cross the dirt roads. It’s a euphoric feeling because, I think part of
it you left all your stuff behind, Sean.
Sean: I agree with you. Hundred percent I think there is a certain
period of existence. Almost a return to the complete self. At least,
I totally I experienced on my own. Few and fleeting moments which I
had very little stuff. There’s something very special about that.
Yeah, I agree with you.
Eric: I think that’s one of the great things about being on an
archeological project because you gradually become to appreciate the
few arms you have and it become more like the people that you’re
working with. Like the old native routine. Right?
I mean you live in hammocks and mosquito nets. You’ve got bad spots. You live the life just Maya do.
I would back on those times with just great deal just the faction and
I missed them sometimes. It’s just a great thing to do. Immerse
yourself into another way of life that’s much more simple and less
stressful really than what we have here on the daily basis.
Sean: I really appreciate you being in the program today and it’s
been a fascinating discussion. I really enjoyed it. I want to point
out to people listening today especially relates to simple living
concepts that were discussed into this program we have the entire
section on the GreenlLvingiIeas.com website that relates to simple
living and concepts there about. So, we invite you to visit that
section that say under the topics menu and the simple living sub menu
and there are different topics underneath there under simple living.
So, my guest again today has been Dr. Eric Gibson. He’s archeologist,
I’ll get it one of these days, He’s an anthropologist who holds a PhD
in anthropology from Harvard University. He is the author of the book,
it’s a fictional book that makes anthropology cool, called ‘Nine Lords
of the Night’ and you can find that online at ninelords.com.
want to thank again my guest Eric Gibson and I also want to thank all
of you for listening today from Green Talk Radio from
GreenLivingIdeas.com. We’ll see you next time.
[plug-in]: Thanks for anyone listening today. Remember for more
free in-demand podcast, articles, videos and other information related
to greener lifestyle visit our website at wwwGgreenLivingiIeas.com. We’d also love to hear your comments feedbacks and questions. Send us an email at editors@GreenLivingiIeas.com.
[Voice Over]: Find more great shows like this on personallifemedia.com.